Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Flag Telecom Acquisition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliance Flag Telecom Acquisition[edit]

Appears to be mostly pro-corp advertising, already speedy deleted per db-advert, but recreated. So AFD posted. Perhaps a merge to Reliance Globalcom would be appropriate. Oscarthecat (talk) 17:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We at IIT Bombay did a study on the acquisition and this wiki entry is a part of our project. We do not intend to advertise any stuff as we are not remotely associated with any of the entities involved. Satyakamd(talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Merge It's nice that someone is studying this, but the subject belongs in the parent article. Part of their study should now include collaborative learning as their content is merged where appropriate and an extraneous topic and article eliminated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who is looking for Reliance's acquisition over Flag Telecom would directly land up in this page, which has all the information about the history and the effects of the merger. I assert, this page should not be deleted as merging it with Reliance Globalcom would make the whole purpose of this article redundant. This article describes the acquisition and not the company in general. Satyakamd(talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 04:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I feel no one has any more problem with the article being present. The article, as clearly seen, if only of academic interest only and no hidden motive attached.Satyakamd(talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.78.217.160 (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I remain of the opinion it's of little interest, or at the least warrants merging into the main article. --Oscarthecat (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:N. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 22:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a corporate acquisition of little general interest - happy for something to be merged into the relevant company articles, but I'm not sure that any of the writing in the article is of a suitably high quality to keep. If kept, needs major work, as it is poorly written, overly promotional in tone, and not written like an encyclopædia article. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.