Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Release Radio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Release Radio[edit]
- Release Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable mobile telephone service, unsourced Rapido (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 18:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This was a service offered by Virgin Mobile and has now been axed. The service was in the form of a radio station, albeit limited audiences. There is no real reason to delete this. --Cexycy (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I added a reference to a press release verifying that this was real (and claiming that it was the first ever of its kind); hard to argue that it's an awesome article as it stands but it could be WP:BETTER. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 04:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This page was created over a year ago and does not have enough detail. No Noteability. Old service. --MWOAP (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It may have been real, and a press release may prove that--but I see no proof of notability anywhere, in any search. Drmies (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this cell phone service. Joe Chill (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to a lack of coverage. I bet Virgin doesn't even renew their trademark on the name.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 02:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.