Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reise Allassani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (talk) 04:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reise Allassani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. This footballer has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning he does not meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Lots of articles are going to popup that will fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, but the guy just signed to Coventry and when a club like that is willing to pay to acquire a player my gut is telling me to give this one a chance and send it to draft, it may be WP:Crystal, but it can't hurt to have this in draft-space. Govvy (talk) 09:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG through this piece in the Independent. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 11:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added the Independent source as well as one more, meets GNG/BASIC. Sam Sailor 05:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 16:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft - Not convinced that one lengthy article on its own is sufficient for GNG. could well be notable in the near future though. Fenix down (talk) 11:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG per Giant Snowman.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:GNG with sources from Independent, BBC[1] and more. The editor whose username is Z0 09:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.