Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reischea Canidate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 03:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reischea Canidate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article cites no references, nor in my opinion establishes notoriety. »Petiatil ^{( talk  contribs)} 04:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced BLP with no indication of notability.Mdtemp (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subjects twitter page is not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.