Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinhard Blutner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reinhard Blutner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently fails WP:PROF and the general notability guideline. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. GS gives h index = 13. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. He has a couple of very well cited papers, but not enough different ones to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1, and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.