Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rein Weiss Ritter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rein Weiss Ritter[edit]

This element of the Super Robot Wars series does not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, this is just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrudgelmir (Mecha). All resulted to deletion of the relevant articles. Magioladitis (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion and consensus should be reached here. Dengero (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources give any significant coverage to this fictional robot, failing notability standards. The background information and technical specifications are in-universe and out of the project's scope. There is no significant information that requires author attribution if any salvagable information is merged into a list: descriptions can be written by anyone. Jappalang (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note Similar elements such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RyuKoOh/KoRyuOh have been recently deleted. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reason all other elements of Super Robot Wars were nominated and deleted. -- nips (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, no real-world context, nothing but fictional history and stats. gnfnrf (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.