Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reighann Olivero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reighann Olivero[edit]

Reighann Olivero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which Tuvalu footballers with Wikipedia articles fail WP:GNG? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK since I last checked it appears they've gone, but should I nominate Lorenzo Capicchioni, Simone Franciosi, Samuel Pancotti, Pietro Sopranzi and Mattia Ceccaroli for deletion, as they've only played in friendlies for San Marino against Saint Lucia? Not much references for them so they're about as notable as the Gibraltar women's footballers. Not trying to be whataboutist, just saying that if this is the new rule then I'll go nominate them for deletion as they also fail the notablity guidelines. VampireKilla (talk) 17:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If no actual significant coverage of them exists in Sammarinese independent media then certainly they should all be sent to AfD. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@VampireKilla: There's only three Tuvaluan football players with articles (one of which is only notable for his later political career) – most of them were deleted earlier this year. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.