Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Registryasp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Registryasp[edit]
- Registryasp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The current article does not contain any sources to establish the subject's notability or produce properly verified material. CorporateM (Talk) 03:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A firm going about its business (though the article has some lovely PR WP:PEACOCKery: rather than "sign a contract", they "hit the jackpot"); but no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This article's luck has run out, I mean delete. Unfortunately, there's not enough coverage for this company. Also, it's promotional. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:03, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and of course they do not sell solutions! That is just a buzzword, as is the acronym soup. Perhaps some day an article on the parent company might be more likely to survive, whose official name seems to be Qinetics Solutions Berhad, sigh. Too bad, since we do need more coverage of the Internet outside of North America and Europe, but this is not it. W Nowicki (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.