Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Elite Airline Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Delta Air Lines. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regional Elite Airline Services[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was a PROD on this that was removed because it's "likely" notable. Going by the sources in the article though, all of which are primary or dead links, and the fact that I was unable to find multiple in-depth reliable sources about it in a WP:BEFORE it's notability is extremely unlikely. Maybe it could at least be redirected to Delta Air Lines. Although, it's not a likely search term. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Delta Air Lines, possibly merging a small bit into that article mentioning the subsidiary. Redirects are cheap. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Delta Air Lines, as a wotldwide operation sources would be likely offline if not online, deadlinks are not a reason for deletion as they can be fixed in most cases, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links are only important in relation to saying if the article or subject of the article has in-depth reliable sources about it or not. Which can't be determined if the links are dead. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The topic isn’t notable and most of the sources are from the company’s defunct website or airport maps. The edit history has largely been promotional content and gripes about management. Delta is a large corporation of many former subsidiaries. The Delta article isn’t improved by jamming this content in there. Minnemeeples (talk) 13:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.