Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginald Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reginald Lee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG; subject has received very little RS coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 18:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing in the article that makes him noteworthy for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are certainly other sources besides the few included in the article. Lee's role and the evidence he gave at the enquiry is reprised in the 2012 play Titanic: Scenes from the British Wreck Commissioner’s Inquiry, 1912[1] and [2], and discussed in several books, eg Titanic: A Very Deceiving Night[3], The Titanic Story: Hard Choices, Dangerous Decisions[4]. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Borderline one, this, but the disaster has been written about so often that I think one of the lookouts on duty at the time is just about notable enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being one of the lookouts who saw the iceberg seems like a notable feat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:E80A:969:6AC3:C51A (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.