Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reform Party of Florida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reform Party of Florida[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable state branch of a notable federal party. The party achieved no electoral success, with its only notable performances being in races with no major-party opposition. Most other coverage revolves wholly around federal campaigns related to the federal party exclusively. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Any useful information can be merged into appropriate articles. Toa Nidhiki05 14:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would like to see an ATD of Merge per Nom. If that does not find consensus then I will side with Delete. One only has to look at the 11 year membership, a peak of 4,616, to be skeptical. A somewhat novel idea might be to merge to the National affiliate, the Alliance Party (United States). The Start-class article mentions this affiliate, American Party of South Carolina, Independence Party of Minnesota, and Independent Party of Connecticut. It would be considered the parent article ( yet some want Wikipedia to grow beyond all wildest dreams, --or-- some just love creating new articles or turning red links blue, but it sometimes seems preferential to create an unassessed, stub, or start-class article instead of building a single far improved article. It might be of interest to find that the Modern Whig Party merged with the American Moderates Party and the American Party of South Carolina forming the Alliance Party. This is not mentioned in the Modern Whig Party article just that it ceased activities and became a think tank. My point is that sometimes fragmented articles would be better merged that would be a net positive for Wikipedia and certainly for readers' navigation. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability requirements, with no sources to demonstrate significant coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.