Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflex/Wolfpack Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reflex/Wolfpack Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A record label, which is a business, that does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:NCORP Graywalls (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't know where to search for Belgian/Flemish sources, but I highly doubt this record label has made cultural a cultural impact, as the article says it focused on re-issues. Therefore the label will not have impacted any culturally significant artists. The two artists originally produced by the label do not have any indication of notability. Therefore this topic is not notable as a record label, and is not notable per NMUSIC#5. Per nominator, topic is also not notable as a business per GNG or NCORP. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment When I checked links to this article, there are a number of notable bands, the text of which says something along the lines of "Wolfpack has reisued band's material." Does this strike anyone else as promotional? If being reissued by this label were a sure sign of prestige/accomplishment, then well and good. However, these claims aren't reliably sourced, so I kinda think we've been spammed. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @78.26:, you're right on spamming. Look at contribution history and compare the user name with the founder name. Graywalls (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.