Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflections of Humanity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ali Shariati#Major works. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reflections of Humanity[edit]

Reflections of Humanity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this lecture is notable in any way. There is nothing stating why it's notable or important to anything. Why does this have an article? I have never done this before, so please go easy on me if I am missing something. Woworiginal (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Ali Shariati where this is mentioned in a list as one of his works. I would oppose a "merge" because this article as it stands, is a completely unsourced WP:OR based entirely on the primary source. Joyous! | Talk 22:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a reason you prefer this redirect over the other suggested? Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think either would be fine. If I was looking up that work, and there was no article for it, I would rather read about the author, then hit the link to the philosophy, in that order. I don't have a strong feeling, other than it should be a redirect to either one of those, instead of a merge. Joyous! | Talk 00:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.