Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reelmonk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reelmonk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Are three articles enough for a company to warrant inclusion? The articles do more than mention the joint or give their URL, I will agree with that, but whether that makes this outfit notable, I have my doubts. Drmies (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Extensive news coverage in major Indian newspapers and going beyond press releases, meeting GNG. I found and added an additional launch-day article in English and coverage in Tamil as well as Malayalam, plus a follow-up story also in a major paper. I've tweaked the writing to make it more neutral. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: Reelmonk

Keep as suitable stub article. Though they need sorting, sources indicate the topic meets WP:ORG. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article does meet WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 13:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it seems marginally acceptable for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.