Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rediscovering God in America (film series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 14:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rediscovering God in America (film series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NF -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC) (As Nominator)[reply]

Delete. Perhaps the info could be expanded on in a section of the Gingrich article? dci | TALK 04:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Rediscovering God in America. As this is a multimedia production it makes sense to cover the various formats together under the common title. Warden (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the book article at Rediscovering God in America#Film series where the films NOW have mention and sourcing. While it is through multiple reliable secondary coverage that this film topic passes WP:NF, I opt for a redirect. Both topics have independent and sourcable notability, but the book and the documentaries are intricately related and so deeply intertwined that is best to have them all togerther at one location. Improving the articles will simply require a bit of work... and lacking editorial attention to either of the articles is not cause for deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG DELETE Fails WP:NF as Nom'd, it is clearly not notable. It also has WP:IRS issues as does the book page which is also nominated for deletion. Newmanoconnor (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain yourself. Why does this merit a strong delete in block capitals? How is this clearly not notable? See the links I give below. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and keep Rediscovering God in America. Taking book and series together they are clearly notable; taken apart either may be notable though it's more arguable. Film may be notable per[1][2][3][4] but coverage in joint article may be better. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: more than enough sources to establish notability.– Lionel ^(talk) 13:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.