Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redin Kingsley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by User:Materialscientist via WP:G4 rationale. (non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redin Kingsley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The individual appears to fail WP:NACTOR. I've seen a few sources that give the individual trivial mentions (such as CNN-News18 and an opinion piece in The Indian Express), but nothing I've encountered indicates that the individual passes WP:BASIC. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as previous discussion decided to delete and this has not been overturned. PatGallacher (talk) 12:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussion was deleted by author's request. The AfD never arrived at a consensus and was closed after the page was already deleted. The author was/is a sock and their call to delete was not likely in good faith. The new author showing up after 7 years of inactivity for a single-purpose page creation does not inspire confidence either. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.