Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Book (Jung)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WITHDRAWN (non-admin closure). RadioFan (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Book (Jung)[edit]

~~contested redirect (to author's page), no indication that this book passes~~ WP:NB RadioFan (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have created this article and I believe it should stay for the following reasons:

The book is mentioned on many sources and returns about 30,000 results on google.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Red+book%22+jung&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10

There is already a spanish article on the subject which has been created two months ago and was not nominated for deletion

User:Arthur_B(talk) 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep Carl Gustav Jung was one of the important scientists of the 20th century and each of his works should have own article. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn The work has been cited in others work sufficiently to indicate notability. Article needs some serious work though.--RadioFan (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.