Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recurvity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Geogre with the reason "Goofy stew; in English, but not English". Seems to be CSD:G1. Stifle 01:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recurvity[edit]

Besides being a largely obsolete dictdef (definition), this has nothing to do with physics of mathematics and seems to be a hoax. Karol 09:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page is unreadable, unwikified and contains nonsense ("P.S. William Gibson Is The Originator Of The Term Cyberspace").Soothing R 09:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems more like test than serious article.--Jan Smolik 13:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is hard to see what the author was trying to achieve with this. The text is neither true nor amusing. (aeropagitica) 13:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as ambiguous nonsense. --Lockley 14:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per patent nonsense. My head hurts after trying to make sense of that. --Kinu 22:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as gibberish --DV8 2XL 01:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks like it's been deleted already. Karol 18:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.