Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reckless Crew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz ^talk 17:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reckless Crew[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was a DJ/Producer collective with many people, a few of whom became notable in other endeavors later. But as an entity unto itself it generated no significant and reliable media notice that is necessary for notability. The article is dependent on interviews with members Terror Danjah and Bruza, and a couple of those interviews list Reckless Crew once as either guy's early project, and the other interviews do not mention the collective at all. The other sources in the article are minor database and directory listings, and most of those are actually dedicated to some of the members, not to this crew as a whole. More of the same is all that can be found in a search. Longtime leader Terror Danjah has accomplished other things and if he had a WP article, Reckless Crew could be redirected there, but he does not. So deletion is recommended. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 02:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 02:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 02:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-09 ✍️ create, 2020-08 ✗ G7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.