Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Eleven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted G11 by Seraphimblade. (non-admin closure) !dave 11:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel Eleven[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find substantial third-party mentions, apparently not notable independent of its artists (I'm getting lots of birch bark canoe hits though :p) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. There's nothing in the article that's not promotional. In addition, fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.