Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Anstey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The strongest arguments here in terms of Wikipedia policy reflected the lack of reliable sources, either in the article (or, had there been any, sources advanced by the participants in the discussion). Such sources are required to establish notability under our notability guidelines, as stated most clearly at WP:NRVE. --joe decker^{talk to me} 20:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Rebecca Anstey

Rebecca Anstey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable hoax. IPs (most with long lists of talk page warnings) are spamming this model's name in various articles, such as Victoria's Secret, Supermodel (in both cases, the IP claims she is a Victoria's Secret Angel, which is not true), Sex symbol, and Model. Article is pure promotion. G-news returns nothing and none of the websites for the magazines she has supposedly been on the cover of do either.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 14:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - The links do lead to the correct websites, and it is clear on the shakedownmodels website that she is the director of it - it also states that charlotte devaney is also a director so that link is relevant also - the writer also gives links to the modeling agencies which she is with so that is varified. There is also a press release link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modelmagic (talk • contribs) 18:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)--Modelmagic (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - possibly a G11 candidate. This article is a completely promotional puff piece on a model who does not meet any notability requirements. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable person. As above, possibly even a speedy candidate. doomgaze (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - Brooke Anstey is a notable person and is famous in Greece and many oountries in Europe. Her links lead to the correct sources, and there are press releases published in her name. Also she has been in the newspapers recently for the same story - Rebecca Anstey is known as a model by many mens magazines including the super famous Playboy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.248.88 (talk) 08:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. IP user 82.132, please DO NOT delete other peoples contributions to this discussion as you did here, this is considered exteremely bad practice and it will not help your cause. I have restored the removed text. doomgaze (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

• Comment - regarding the two keep arguments above, a press release in no way establishes notability for an individual. And if she is "famous in Greece and...Europe", why is there no significant coverage on her other than promotional press releases? --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
  • +1: Press releases are irrelevant, and the article still lacks third-party, significant coverage or really anything that demonstrates notability at all.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 14:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Have we made a decision yet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.136.201 (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The discussion is normally open for 7 days, sometimes longer if no consensus can be reached. You can find more info about the process by clicking here. doomgaze (talk) 16:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.