Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realm of Guardians (Game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 05:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Realm of Guardians (Game)[edit]

Non-notable online game: fails the Web notability criteria. The article is original research and unsourced. Looks like a conflict of interest as well, judging by the Talk page. I deleted the article, as it seemed to me to meet CSD A7, but it was recreated and contested by the author, so I think an AfD discussion would be the best course of action. --Slowking Man 07:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, also contains too much game guide material. MER-C 07:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per abve. WP:NOT an instruction manual/cheat sheet. Grutness...wha? 08:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd suggest speedy delete per db-web, which it fairly obviously qualifies for, but better to leave the door open to db-repost. Danny Lilithborne 09:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The given reason is: It is an article about a web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, podcast, or similar web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.

The reason of entry is not apart of any of the entries above. I will say that that the closest to the the entry is a website. however, I said it was hosted on RGuardians.com, and I do include a link to find this game. If you read on it is about the story, hints and tricks, and reviews for the game. I am sure more information about the game will be given.

In addition, if you think RGuardians.com is just Realm of Guardians you are very wrong. RGuardians.com is a website/portal for Realm of Guardians AND Galactic Guardians (another game only mentioned in the history of Realm of Guardians. If you like we will take away the development history. Which we think is what gives it the questionable view.

As for the other points, we are not a blog, webcomic, or podcasts. We have an online forum but again we do not mention it. All the information I felt that was related to the entry that we put in.

~~Kyle~~

I agree with the game creator. I will give my history with the game and then I will tell you what I think as well. First, my account name is Furlings and I have been playing for about 3 years. (Right when they changed domain names.) I have been an off and on player, and I have enjoyed this game along with other text based games. I do not know Brinn (Brinn is Kyle but I have a hard time refering to him as such) in real life. But I do talk to him on AIM quite a bit. I tell you this so you know where I am coming from.

However, I am going to add a few edits in a few moments however, I think as long as this post doesn't start promoting the site it should be kept. I read last night about what Brinn wrote. I know Kyle posted a few of the things he has already posted on his website to fill up content of the site. I am sure it will be changed later.

I believe that this posting will grow. I believe the players of this game will post more than Brinn because he tends to disappear every 2 months only to reappear promoting Realm of Guardians strong. I think he believes that with this the people who use the site will go and learn more about the game, the concepts, how to play, and such. I plan I adding my two sence of how the game was create and my insight.

I am not going to beg you to keep this up. I know Brinn will do that enough for everyone on the site.

~~Eric "Furlings"~~

PS. I am not trying to spam. I just don't think Brinn knew how to do this.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.