Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real zombie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close. I don't necessarily think that this is a hoax per se, as this link shows that this is something that the person genuinely believes in. However I do think that at best this is something someone came up with WP:ONEDAY and constitutes original research to the point where there's no real chance that this would pass notability guidelines anytime soon. That two of the links appear to be ones created by the original editor gives me some concern over possible self promotion as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Real zombie[edit]

Real zombie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be some kind of original research about creating actual zombies. The only reliable sources given do not talk about this possibility. Prod tag removed. ... discospinster talk 00:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This looks like nonsense. Cannolis (talk) 02:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - agree, "nonsense" is apt. Just someone's blog/essay. Stlwart111 02:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Correct me if I'm wrong, but this nearly unintelligible article seems to be about using 3D printers to print off zombies. This is not actually possible, so I believe speedy deletion per G3 (blatant hoaxes) is a good outcome. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.