Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real witches
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. per SNOW StarM 03:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Real witches[edit]
- Real witches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like someone's essay. WP:OR? Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 01:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That and totally unverifiable. Delete. -- roleplayer 01:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete We have potential WP:OR issues, but also WP:V, and this really is a fringe theory that witches exist. Articles on witchcraft are great, but not if they're asserting (without sources) that they exist in the real world. Fraud talk to me 02:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with fire (and brimstone). Citing "ancient folklore" doesn't cut it, seriously. Doubly so when it's treated as fact. Zetawoof(ζ) 03:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant to Witchcraft and related articles. I don't think that the entry would a good redirect. Also delete per Zetawoof but please see if they weigh the same as a duck first.--Lenticel (talk) 04:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not an article. JuJube (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Press to death because it's clearly wrong, but equally clearly not a real witch. (OR, FWIW.) AlexTiefling (talk) 11:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Impossibly unverifiable, total OR, seems to be written as an essay, etc. Lacks any form of sources whatsoever. RedThunder 11:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Burn at the stake! — Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Delete. MuZemike (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a publisher of completely incorrect thought, however unoriginal. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources and unverifyable, and like an essay.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Firebat08 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Isn't it Snowing yet? Edward321 (talk) 00:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.