Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real soon now

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Real soon now[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not conform with Not a dictionary and Notability policies. Also, the article is only the definition of an acronym and most likely should only be included in the list of acronyms, if that. If such acronyms like TBA and TBD do not have separate pages, this also should not. Webmaster961 (talk) 05:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - already in Wiktionary as "RSN". This could be a soft redirect to there, I suppose. JohnCD (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "As popularised"? Geschichte (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If it's in Wiktionary, then that's good enough. There should perhaps be some sort of "soft redirect" there. JIP | Talk 20:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete dictionary definition, not really an article; reluctant because good, solid explanation (except for the undue emphasis on Pournelle's column). --Orange Mike | Talk 17:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.