Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Deal (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 01:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Real Deal (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Multiple IP editors keep on replacing the redirect with an article. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 18:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and protect the page until/unless somebody can create some meaningful content for it. An IP editor could easily register and recreate the page if it were deleted, so that doesn't really fix the problem, and persistent recreations end up annoying administrators if pages are deleted anyway. It's a plausible redirect if people are looking for the article, so should be kept as people will be redirected to a broader page about Jessie J. Ss 112 18:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 18:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've rewritten the page to comply with NSONG, it's not going to grow beyond stub class but hopefully GeoffreyT2000 could withdraw his or her nomination. Hayman30 (talk) 03:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are plenty of articles covering this song, as shown here, to justify notability. Aoba47 (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I have implemented all the usable ones. Hayman30 (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sufficient coverage, as evidenced above, to meet WP:NSONG. gongshow talk 21:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage for the song is sufficient, as can be seen here and here.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.