Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reagan Dale Neis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reagan Dale Neis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neis has not had multiple significant roles in notable productions. The article is also only sourced to IMDb, which is not a reliable source. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple roles, significant coverage. I've expanded and added information to the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY based on the many improvements made by Megalibrarygirl. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY as the article has been improved with the addition of multiple reliable sources that pass WP:GNG and also show that the actress has had prominent roles in notable productions, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as article now substantiates that subject is sufficiently notable Fawcett5 (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.