Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ready to Go (Get Me Out of My Mind)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vices & Virtues. Content can be merged from article history. Jujutacular ^talk 12:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to Go (Get Me Out of My Mind)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested with the rationale, The article will improve when more details are released. Actually, the right way to do it is to wait until more details make their way into reliable third-party coverage before the article can be created. Song with no evidence of notability independent of the album it comes from, should be merged with Panic! at the Disco until it does. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Another translation of The article will improve when more details are released is, "There is not enough information for an article, so let's keep this rather empty piece of Wiki around until someone starts writing about it". There is no deadline, it's not due for an assignment tomorrow or anything, so merge for now. CycloneGU (talk) 22:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge It will be a single soon, no reason for delete. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 21:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per WP:NSONGS for non-notable songs. Would suggest that the album article, Vices & Virtues, is a more appropriate merge target than the artist article though. Rlendog (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, always merge to the album, not the artist - unless the album article doesn't exist, then merge to the artist. CycloneGU (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.