Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReBirth (series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ReBirth (series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no point of having this article. There's no official "ReBirth" series per se. Just three Wiiware games produced by Konami that just happens to have the word "ReBirth" on their titles. It would be like creating a list of every Nintendo-made game that has the word "Super", "64", "Deluxe", or "Advance" on their titles. Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with the Konami article. I'm not sure I agree with the nom that the games aren't related, they were all worked on by the same developer and all have the same theme (e.g. shoot people), but these games aren't notable enough to have an article like this. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I cannot find anything verifiable about the series itself (as opposed to the games in the series) to build an article from. Unfortunately, the only thing I see here as referential to the series is the navbox itself. Bringing in sources from games would cause redundancy, content copyright concerns, and original research. MuZemike 00:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing that isn't already pointed out in M2 (game developer). Marasmusine (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.