Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re-exportation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus (defaults to Keep). kingboyk 08:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-exportation[edit]

This should be in Wiktionary, it's not of encyclopedic value. - MB (Talk) 11:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but cleanup. Seems it could be expanded to a decent article. --Ton e 13:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like a dictdef to me. --kingboyk 11:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
kingboyk 11:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, important issue in internation trade. Kappa 11:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Add an appropriate {{stub}} and keep it. Even as a stub it could use some copyedit though -- Hirudo 16:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.