Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Every participant in this AFD is the same editor. If someone wishes to renominate this in good faith then be my guest. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rayzz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - This is clearly a marketing article, and checking the edit history shows it was created by the company. Software is unremarkable and contravenes WP:POLICY. Phatwa (talk) 09:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the nom; please close seven days after 12:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In line with WP:NOTADVERTISING 86.132.72.69 (talk) 12:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC) — 86.132.72.69 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable noted re: advertising also. Cannot find any noteworthy references to this company or software that merit a mention according to Policy. 86.132.81.190 (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC) — 86.132.81.190 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. Both delete !votes in this discussion are from editors with few or no edits outside this discussion and both geolocate to the same city. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.