Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Van Ness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ray Van Ness[edit]
- Ray Van Ness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this talented voice under WP:GNG or WP:ENT. There is a bit of reliable evidence for him, I've added a book which lists him at the bottom of a list of several hundred [sic] other credited actors, but I've seen nothing in the way of in-depth coverage, nor a significant role. Additional sources welcomed, as always. joe deckertalk to me 21:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage about this individual to establish notability. I'll also note that the book noted in the nomination is Who Was Who on Tv, Volume 1 published by Xlibris, a self-publishing company so it's questionable as a reliable source. -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 01:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to MyNetworkTV_telenovelas where he is mentioned. Otherwise, insufficient coverage for his own aricle.Marikafragen (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.