Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Neff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Neff[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines for academics. Libertybison (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found one reliably published review of his book Dark Union (or actually half of a review since it is also a review of another book): Pfau, Indiana Mag. Hist.. I don't think it's enough for WP:AUTHOR. We need multiple published reviews of multiple books. But if enough additional in-depth coverage of Neff or his works turns up, I might be willing to change my mind. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This falls under the rules about fringe theorists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom, for failing WP:NACADEMIC. Ifnord (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability guidelines for academics, biographies, and subjects in general. --Jack Frost (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.