Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Gun (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili ^說嗎? 03:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Gun (film)[edit]

This article was originally listed for deletion a year ago, and was kept (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Gun (movie)). This film is not happening, it is so not happening that both IMDB and BCDB, gossip-snatchers as they are, have removed the film from their databases. This is a perfect example of why we should not have articles on rumoured films: far more of them don't get made than actually do get made. This article should be deleted unless anyone can provide any recent evidence that it is going to be made in the immediate future. Rje 01:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The El Reyko 01:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's not a film because it's not being produced. It might well be produced in the future, but it's not even in pre-production. It's a pitch, or a script, and it's not worthy of an encyclopedia entry. - Richardcavell 01:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, crystal ball and whatnot. — AKADriver ☎ 01:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - the result of the original debate was to merge and redirect to Pixar, not keep, but for some reason that didn't happen. Morgan Wick 02:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 02:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Some reports suggest, but other reports indicate? This seems so contrived to be a crystal ball violation that it's making me think Wikihoax. --Deville (Talk) 03:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pixar. This movie was talked about for long enough to make it somewhat notable, just not in its own article. Arctic Gnome 05:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 08:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 09:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.