Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray's Parlour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was snowy delete. Sango 123 (e) 18:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ray's Parlour[edit]

4 Ghits TOTAL and the only one that seems relevant is the Wikipedia entry itself. NN. Devotchka 03:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and delete now It's obviously just a nonsense article. It's a play on words and nothing more. I've been racking my brain to think of some speedy deletion criteria this fits into, but I just can't come up with it. -- Kicking222 04:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly non-notable.--Pharos 04:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Borderline nonsense. RobLinwood 04:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One-off joke about the Romford Pele. -- GWO
Delete as the article doesn't assert anything, let alone notability. Than again, maybe I'm giving it too much credit. Kevin 11:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 12:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if this is not a hoax (and I can't remember it) it was just a bit in a forgotten show [1] and is therefore nowhere near notable enough for its own entry. Keresaspa 13:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn borderline nonsense, dubious veracity: I don't recall this programme actually occurring. Qwghlm 18:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. ILove Plankton ⁽ ^L⁾ 16:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't know what this has to do with a parlor. --Starionwolf 05:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.