Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawalpindi/Islamabad Union of Journalists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rawalpindi/Islamabad Union of Journalists[edit]

Rawalpindi/Islamabad Union of Journalists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kostas20142 (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. unless someone fixes it. Consist of unsourced advocacy. DGG ( talk ) 15:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced since creation 12 years ago(?!) and no sign of notability under any standard. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.