The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable programming language RogueNinjatalk 08:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree, no evidence of notability, as all sources in article were clearly written by the designer of the language. Qwfp (talk) 00:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
