Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rats & Bullies : The Dawn-Marie Wesley Story
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Anthony Appleyard 21:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rats & Bullies : The Dawn-Marie Wesley Story[edit]
- Rats & Bullies : The Dawn-Marie Wesley Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Short documentary film; speedy-tagged as spam (see author's contribution history). I declined speedy because the article at least asserts the film's notability (2 indep. news sources). Bringing here for full discussion. NawlinWiki 20:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral (so far). I am not sure yet whether this has sufficient notability to remain, but I fully agree with the decision to discuss it here --Zeraeph 20:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's not a short, it's 102 minutes. It won two awards at the 2004 Thunderbird International Film Festival, whatever that is. It seems a worthy and very high-quality product. It seems to have impinged itself to a small extent upon Canadian conscousness. Herostratus 16:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is Thunderbird International Film Festival and here is 2004 Thunderbird International Film Festival at IMDB. See what you think. I admit to feeling prejudiced against this film by the promotional activities of the Producer on Wikipedia, not because it was against all policy (though it was), but rather because it looked SO unprofessional to me that is gave me a sense of the documentary as unprofessional. However it does seem that it might be a worthwhile project after all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeraeph (talk • contribs) 11 June 2007
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.