Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratna Ghoshal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 11:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ratna Ghoshal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not able to find source about her. Does not meet criteria Parthhalder (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Parthhalder (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the nominator has proceeded without WP:BEFORE. The person clearly passes WP:ENT and WP:GNG verified by WP:RS listed in the article itself. I am neither connected nor subject to WP:COI or WP:UPE. I have decided to create and expand redirects only I found them to be notable enough. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: I cannot accept that the subject easily passes GNG. None of the sources in the article are actually able to give her enough sigcov. They are actually talking about the movies and TV shows which she was a part of. So general GNG criteria is not met. I said week keep in the sense that she had some notable roles in multiple number of television show. So she may barely pass NACTOR. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 14:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:ENT. Johnbod (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Covered in various Indian secondary sources.--Ipigott (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : has appeared in loads of notable films and television series. Plenty of sources. Furius (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:ENT Sonofstar (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, and an added source for her latest significant role in a notable work; she also is one of the subjects of a documentary. Beccaynr (talk) 18:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:ENT as per all. Articuno appears (talk) 12:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.