Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational solution for Collaborative Lifecycle Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kvng does not adress the question of notability and Concertmusic simply show that the software is mentioned, not that the coverage is substantial. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rational solution for Collaborative Lifecycle Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Jcarlosmartins (talk) 09:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jcarlosmartins, did you look for sources WP:BEFORE submitting this nomination? Bad sourcing is not a valid WP:DEL-REASON would you like to try another? ~Kvng (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any Wikipedia acceptable source. It seems like this is a non-notable article. Jcarlosmartins (talk) 10:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - No valid reson given for deletion and no response from nom. ~Kvng (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable software system. Article goes into a lot of depth about the detailed functions of this software which I think is just filler text to make the article not a stub. 122.60.173.107 (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can we redierct to Rational Software as an WP:ATD? ~Kvng (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot keep a redirect if there is no referenced content on the page you want to redirect to. --Jcarlosmartins (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Rational Software, per my !vote on the other AfD for the similar product from the same company. Does not have enough references or notability for its own article, but could do well as a subsection. jp×g 16:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick search on Google Books and Google Scholars found a number of books dealing with Collaborative Application Lifecycle Management (CALM) that use this particular suite of tools in examples of good ALM. Similarly, I found 2 theses from Computer Science programs that also cite this software suite, as well as other papers, such as one from the IEEE.--Concertmusic (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.