Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasool shahsevani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rasool shahsevani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think this meets the guidelines of WP:BLP. Referring to the subject of the article as an international genius is not neutral and the sources that were given are difficult to verify. Additionally I have broader concerns about the notability of this person. I think in order to bring this page into compliance, it would have to be fundamentally rewritten. Therefore I am proposing its deletion. Mww113 (talk) 09:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "#1 ref" has the name of the subject mentioned at two places. "#2 ref" Mentions Shahsavani at 1 place. "#3 ref" does not mention the subject. The above written "Find sources" link does not give any sources. No third party reliable sources which discuss the subject in a little detail or has significant coverage about the subject to establish notability. So, fails WP:Notability & WP:Sources. Peppy Paneer (talk) 10:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by all means as there's simply nothing to suggest better at this time. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.