Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashid Awad Rashid Al Uwaydah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If a cover article appears and the content is needed, let me know so I can bring it back. Tone 20:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rashid Awad Rashid Al Uwaydah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Apart from a single short paragraph on the website of Andy Worthington, not a single reliable secondary source has paid any attention to Uwaydah (he is mentioned twice in long lists of detainees, that's it). Fram (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article's subject has not been covered by reliable secondary sources, such as news organizations. The article relies instead on primary sources. Subject fails notability.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect The sources are reliable to verify the material in the article. I continue to think that every identifiable Gitmo prisoner is and will remain notable, but from previous AfDs I rather doubt there is consensus on that, & I suggest a redirection to an appropriate list or combination article. DGG ( talk ) 23:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject lacks "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources and is therefore not notable under WP:GNG. Bulk of sources are primary documents under WP:PRIMARY. Anotherclown (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.