Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjitha Menon (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjitha Menon[edit]

Ranjitha Menon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject seems non-notable as she has never done a lead role, as i noted. Most of the references are Non-RS. Misterrrrr (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject has acted in more than 3 films so far and had acted as heroine / lead role in 2 movies namely Saajan Bakery Since 1962 [1][2]and Pathrosinte Padappukal [3][4] as per the news articles referenced in the article. Her role in the movies are critically-acclaimed in movie reviews as well. Jehowahyereh (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Speedy delete: Article was draftified earlier in the day, then copy-paste recreated by primary editor. Small edit war followed, then AFD. Copy-paste is an unacceptable response to an article being draftified. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Post that, the draft should be reviewed. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, the editor who draftified it and tagged speedy delete after draftying it, so moving back to the orginal page was not possible,so I did manual revert. and there was no edit further for an edit war. The person who draftified it is relatevely a new editor who started his account in 2022 and did the wrong thing. Jehowahyereh (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, you didn't have to do that. There are other procedures (such as WP:RM/TR) to effect those changes. Copy-paste is never the correct response to this. When confronted by "I can't do this", the best recourse is to ask someone else who might know how to get it done. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okie, so is there any request that can be given to reinstate the edit history? Jehowahyereh (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The process would be to delete the article, and put the draft up for review. Continue editing on the draft (are the references and assertions of notability above in the draft?) and I expect the draft will be accepted, and that will resolve everything. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Or, like I'd mentioned, WP:RM/TR. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Nomination is based on the false premise that she hasn't performed a lead role. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Does the Subject passes WP:GNG? --- Misterrrrr (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.