Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjeet Jha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjeet Jha[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources presented are inadequate and the film roles provided are not enough to meet WP:NACTOR. I have found no substantial coverage that would make the subject pass WP:GNG. (There is this piece but the source is not reliable.) Modussiccandi (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 15:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current coverage fails in passing WP:NACTOR. Setreis (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Roles fall short of WP:NACTOR and the only independent reliable source coverage (i.e. WP:GNG) that I can find are passing mentions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 01:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, snow is falling. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.