Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rani Agrawal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit,

The article had several credible links from local newspapers in India. The said movie in question was also listed on IMDB, Youtube. Can you please help me understand what would be required to re-instate this article?

Thanks. Lovelustlife (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rani Agrawal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~No WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV, Only one source film Love recipe that too not independent and definitely not reliable. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)~~ struck confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cinzia007 (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:RELY are used here. Not fulfilling the WP:GNG policy. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on number of TV series and films, she would seem to qualify based on guidelines of WP:ENT. I also say this because several of teh TV series she has been in have Wiki pages, so they would seem to be notable TV series, hence it establishes notability. Jupiteralien (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not satisfying the WP:GNG policy. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of meeting NACTOR and lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. Many Indian TV shows themselves rest on shaky notability, so merely having linked articles is not sufficient. Needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources which is not the case here, nothing worthy was found in a BEFORE search. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.