Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Camacho (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Camacho[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was prodded by Lincolnite (talk · contribs) with the following rationale: "Fails to meet the general notability guidelines. Definitely fails WP:POLITICIAN."

A little history here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Camacho was created on 16 December 2010 but the nomination was not completed properly and the discussion went stale. I NAC'd that a few minutes ago and thought the best course of action would be to open a new AfD, so here we are. For my part, I am neutral for now. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 06:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable election candidate. Fails notability guidelines in WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Valenciano (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 12:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 12:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Article doesn't seems to meet notability guidelines. Failed candidate without something significant in addition usually fails at AfD.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 14:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 16:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable per guidelines referenced above —Eustress ^talk 01:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability indicated apart from being a political candidate, which per WP:POLITICIAN is not enough. 79.69.239.132 (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Meets neither notability guideline nor WP:POLITICIAN.--JayJasper (talk) 03:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.