Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Svane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Svane[edit]

Composer, does have ghits but I haven't found any secondary source coverage of note on him. This article has been created and SD'd three times, we should settle whether he meets notability standards, but it doesn't look like he meets WP:CREATIVE. Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. WP:MUSIC seems primarily oriented towards pop music rather than classical music, but the sources that were listed in the article prior to Mr. Vernon's nomination and the additional sources listed on Svane's review listing may be enough for criterion #1 there (or WP:BIO), "multiple non-trivial independent reliably published works". —David Eppstein (talk) 21:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep Borderline notability; has been reviewed in a wide variety of notable publications. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above -- IRP ☎ 14:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The references in the article seem to be enough to establish notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.