Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranae Shrider
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'll be glad to userfy this if anybody wants to work on it Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ranae Shrider[edit]
- Ranae Shrider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable autobiographical article in which the only apparent "citations" are not from independent secondary reliable sources, but appear to be from promotional web-sites. JOJ Hutton 18:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As an actress and comedian, I can find little in the way of non-promotional sources to suggest that she is notable (this seems to suggest that she is not incredibly active). There does seem to be significant coverage of a legal case involving her and Verne Troyer [1] [2] [3] but this all happens over about a month; certainly not sustained coverage. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Of the list of 5 "references" for this BLP, 1 is a broken link, 2 of them simply end up at her headshot and name but no text, 1 is an appearance on a podcast (not really a news source, other than to indicate she was alive at that time), and one is a few sentences about an appearance she had on Howard Stern in 2008, certainly nothing newsworthy or that would satisfy WP:GNG. Other links are self-promotional, and as ItsZippy points out, her only other appearance in the media might only barely satisfy WP:BLP1E.
- Delete, sub-notable autobiography. Hairhorn (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Certainly the current state suffers from poor souring and poorer tone, but these are quite often addressable issues that do not require deletion. In looking at the many, available reliable sources speaking toward this comedian,[4] it seems that most deal with her relationship and problems with Verne Troyer, but still... within them are facts that can be used to support much of this article. Who's up for a little work? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 11:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.