Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramu Yalamanchi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hi5. Redirects are cheap. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ramu Yalamanchi[edit]

Ramu Yalamanchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable entrepreneur. Affiliated with one blue-linked company hi5 that's only marginally notable itself. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or not independent company. The company has been acquired, and the subject does not appear to have a notable career since. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to hi5. Was not able to find any sources on this individual, but they are associated primarily with the one company and redirects are cheap. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.