Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramsey Bergeron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsey Bergeron[edit]

Ramsey Bergeron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor in my opinion it does not pass WP:ACTOR FITINDIA (talk) 13:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Actor has several credits listed on IMDB[1], commercials listed on Screen Actors Guild recognized site [2], and is the spokesperson for an international sports nutrition company [3]. Lowcawki (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note per edit summary in Draft:Ramsey Bergeron that Lowcawki is affiliated with the subject. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for more info. czar 06:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sorry, Lowcawki, the subject of your article just doesn't meet the Notability Guidelines for Actors. It may be a case of WP:TOOSOON Exemplo347 (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There are no authoritative references and nothing that shows notability. Just a guy who has done a bunch of stuff.--Rpclod (talk) 21:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. His acting credits are mostly of the red shirt type - bouncer, dad, and some guy named Mark. His modeling credits are a bit beefier (pardon the pun), but still no reliable sources attest to his notability. IMdB is the classic unreliable source; we allow it in our articles, but not as a citation. Bearian (talk) 02:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.